← Back to library
article 2021

The laboratory-assessed performance predictors of elite cross-country marathon mountain bikers

Everton Crivoi do Carmo, Renato Barroso, Danilo Marcelo Leite do Prado, Allan Inoue, Tatiane Machado, Cesar Cavinato Cal Abad, Irineu Loturco, Valmor Tricoli

Journal
Kinesiology
DOI
10.26582/k.53.2.9
Publication type
Original scientific paper
Study type
correlational study
Population
elite cross-country marathon mountain bikers
View on DOI ↗

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the relationship between laboratory-assessed variables and cross-country marathon mountain biking (XCM-MTB) performance to suggest a more practical approach to monitor performance during the competitive phase. Nine elite athletes performed a battery of tests during the competitive phase of the season, one week before the race. Correlations between the physiological and neuromuscular laboratory-assessed variables and mean race completion time were verified and a multiple regression model was calculated. Cycling economy (r=0.86), power output at the first (POVT1; r=-0.73) and second ventilatory threshold (POVT2; r=-0.94), VO2peak (r=-0.71), peak power output (r=-0.91); peak power (r=-0.80), and mean power (r=-0.85) were very strongly related to race performance. TMG-derivate factors as rectus femoris (r=-0.61) and biceps femoris (r=-0.59) contraction velocity, 30-cm drop jump performance (r=-0.59), mean propulsive power in jump squat at 40% (JS40%; r=-0.65) and 60% (JS60%; r=-0.62) of athlete’s body weight and lower limbs maximal isometric voluntary strength (r=-0.59) were strongly related to race completion time. In an isolated way, the POVT2 explained 87% of race performance. Although both physiological and neuromuscular variables are related to XCM performance, the POVT2 seems to be the main variable during the competitive phase and an easy-to-apply approach should be used to monitor athletes’ performance.