← Back to library
article 2017 10 pages

Team sport athletes’ perceptions and use of recovery strategies: a mixed-methods survey study

Fiona Crowther, Rebecca Sealey, Melissa Crowe, Andrew Edwards, Shona Halson

Journal
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
DOI
10.1186/s13102-017-0071-3
Publication type
Original Research
Study type
mixed-methods survey
Population
team sport athletes
View on DOI ↗

Abstract

Background

A variety of recovery strategies are used by athletes, although there is currently no research that investigates perceptions and usage of recovery by different competition levels of team sport athletes.

Methods

The recovery techniques used by team sport athletes of different competition levels was investigated by survey. Specifically this study investigated if, when, why and how the following recovery strategies were used: active land-based recovery (ALB), active water-based recovery (AWB), stretching (STR), cold water immersion (CWI) and contrast water therapy (CWT).

Results

Three hundred and thirty-one athletes were surveyed. Fifty-seven percent were found to utilise one or more recovery strategies. Stretching was rated the most effective recovery strategy (4.4/5) with ALB considered the least effective by its users (3.6/5). The water immersion strategies were considered effective/ineffective mainly due to psychological reasons; in contrast STR and ALB were considered to be effective/ineffective mainly due to physical reasons.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that athletes may not be aware of the specific effects that a recovery strategy has upon their physical recovery and thus athlete and coach recovery education is encouraged. This study also provides new information on the prevalence of different recovery strategies and contextual information that may be useful to inform best practice among coaches and athletes.

View this article's peer review reports

Description

A survey study on recovery strategies among team sport athletes.